The Greensboro Sit Ins During The Civil Rights Movement

The Greensboro sit-ins occurred in 1960 in Greensboro, North Carolina. The Greensboro Sit-Ins was a movement with the purpose to banish the inequalities that black people faced. A black person was treated very differently, unequally, and unfairly compared to how a white person was treated. The Greensboro Sit-Ins was noted to be one of the most important events in the Civil Rights movement. Racism and unequal treatment had been a common occurrence around North Carolina since colonial times. Even though slavery was abolished, black people felt they deserved just as much equal freedom as a white person. From the 1880’s to the mid 1960’s in North Carolina and other southern states, there was a law called Jim Crow Laws. The name Jim Crow comes from a character from a theatre production where the performer was white, but would have black face makeup on to mock the blacks. These laws were being enforced in North Carolina and many other towns and states. Jim Crow Laws forced ra cial inequalities towards black people. A black and a white person were forbidden to marry each other. White people were educated at a white school and black people went to a black school. If a black man went to the hospital he would have a black nurse, while a white person would have a white nurse. When boarding the bus a white person may sit anywhere in the front, while a black person was ordered to sit in the very back. Blacks were to drink at separate drinking fountains than the white people used. BlackShow MoreRelatedThe And Civil Rights By William Chafe Essay1246 Words   |  5 PagesTo understand the present and the future one must understand the past.   The book Civilities and Civil Rights by William Chafe provided a detailed look at North Carolina, specifically Greensboro between the years of the 1930s through the 1960’s. The state of events that occur can be linked to many of the events that one sees today due to the fact that the foundation and structure of the south was built on racism. No one came straight out and said they were racist, instead the problem was covered upRead MoreThe Black Civil Rights Movement1120 Words   |  5 PagesThe history of United States is drenched in the fight for equality in the society. From women to gay rights but it is undeniable that the black civil rights was the bloodiest and most violent among them. Two methods were used to bring message to the people: the violent or the non-violent way. Most activists and civil rights group like Martin Luther King Jr., NAACP (National Association for the Advancement of Colored People) and CORE (Congress of Racial Equality) at that time chose for the latterRead MoreCivil Rights Movements and The Greensboro Sit-ins789 Words   |  3 PagesThat day the Woolworth store in Greensboro, North Carolina would be known as the very first sit-in. The Greensboro sit-ins played a major role in the Civil Rights Movements. The three huge sit-ins were Greensboro North Carolina, Na shville sit-ins, and the Oklahoma sit-ins. The sit-ins that started it all were the Greensboro, North Carolina. The date of this sit-in is February 1, 1960. The time was at about noon, one o’clock. There was were four boys that started the sit-in. Their names were Joseph McNeilRead MoreThe Civil Rights Movement in Mississippi, Louisiana, and Alabama.1635 Words   |  7 PagesCivil Rights-the freedoms and rights that a person with-holds as a member of a community, state, or nation. Ever since the beginning of involvement between white and black people there has been social disagreement; mainly with the superiority of the white man over the black man. African Americans make up the largest minority group in the United States and because of this they have been denied their civil rights more than any other minority group(source 12). During the Civil Rights Movement, it wasRead MorePresentation Speech : Prelude Of The Civil Rights Movement 1950s1211 Words   |  5 PagesPresentation Speech: Slide 1: Prelude to the Civil Rights Movement 1950s First, to see how we have gotten to the point of where society is at today, we need to know where we have come from. We can trace the roots of the civil rights movement back to the late 1940s and 1950s, starting with World War 2. During the war, the military was kept segregated, which kept white supremacy prominent. For example, blacks had separate drafts which limited into what branch they could serve. The Air Corps and NavyRead MoreEnd of Segregation933 Words   |  4 Pagesthat a slave only counted as 2/3 of a person. The Dredd Scott Decision by the United States Supreme Court upheld the erroneous belief on the part of early Americans that slaves were property not people (Tsesis 2008, page 77). Following the American Civil War and the passage of the 19th Amendment, this changed and African Americans were finally granted citizenship in the United States. However, African Americans were still not anywhere near equal to whites in the United States, particularly throughoutRead MoreTh e Civil Rights Movement Of North Carolina Essay967 Words   |  4 PagesCarolina should have been the state where the KKK thrived most during the mid-1960s — Cunningham reports that in mid-1966 it had 192 Klaverns, (branches of the Ku Klux Klan), and 52.2 percent of the total Klan membership in the 10 states of the South — was a mystery to many and a source of considerable dismay to the state’s leadership, which prided itself on its nonviolent response to the challenges posed by the civil rights movement. The state had been described by V.O. Key, in his immensely influentialRead MoreHow Far Was Peaceful Protest Responsible for the Successes of the Civil Rights Movement Int He Years of 1955-64?1324 Words   |  6 PagesHow far was the peaceful protest responsible for the successes of the civil rights movement in the years of 1955-64? During 1955-64 USA was still going through racial inequality between whites and blacks. Black campaigns such as Student non-violent coordinating committee, felt that the civil rights movement was too slow and hence needed something to boost them up in order to succeed what they first rose up for, which was desegregation and equality for all. King was a highly charismatic and a giftedRead MoreThe Sixties s Impact On American Society1307 Words   |  6 Pagesreferred to as a period of social protest and dissent. Antiwar demonstrators, civil-rights activists, feminists, and members of various other social groups demanded what they considered to be justice and sought reparation for the wrongs they believed they had suffered. The decade marked a shift from a collective view on politics, to a much more individualistic viewpoint. The 1960s could easily be characterized as a period during which political, ideological, and social tensions among radicals, liberalsRead MoreThe Strength Behind The Nonviolent Student Movement1921 Words   |  8 PagesThe Strength Behind the Nonviolent Student Movement Ideas of nonviolent direct action, largely influenced by Gandhi’s actions in India earlier, spread throughout the 1950s and 1960s. The combination of love and protest, as advocated by new young leaders such as Martin Luther King Jr., inspired many numbers of people, including the student masses. This direct confrontational action, combined with the poise exhibited by participatory activists, inflamed racial tensions and through this brought to national

The Compatibility Of Faith And Essay Research free essay sample

The Compatibility Of Faith And Essay, Research Paper The Compatibility of Faith and Reason When comparing the two choices by W.K. Clifford and William James on the compatibility of religion and ground, I feel that both statements make really valid points. However I do believe, after careful reading and based on my ain experience, that William James has the stronger statement. William James The Will to Believe claims that Our passional nature non merely legitimately may, but must, make up ones mind an option between propositions, whenever it is a echt option that can non by it s nature be decided on rational evidences. James contention is that under certain fortunes, it is absolutely legal for a individual to travel in front and believe something for which scientific grounds is missing. To make so is non unreasonable. This statement makes itself utile in the spiritual hypothesis for the being of God. James, himself, believed that there is a Greater Consciousness than that of human existences to which we are connected. Among other things, this Greater Consciousness cares about and conserves many of the things that we hold beloved to us like love, truth, and justness. This is done so that the values possessed by these things continue to be in the universe instead than diing with us when we die. James contention in this respect was that his beliefs on this affair were absolutely legal even though there is presently no scientific grounds for the being of a Greater Consciousness. He claimed that If we had an infallible mind with it s nonsubjective cocksurenesss so traveling in front and believing something without scientific grounds would non be legal. However that is surely non the instance, so it is our rational responsibility to modulate what we believe through scientific discipline, harmonizing to James. Traveling back to the statement for the being of God, because the being of G od is non a affair of scientific fact why should we suspend our belief in God? James believed that modern scientific discipline is a kind of organized jitteriness. The trials that we put theories through before accepting them as the truth serve one kind of human involvement our fright of being mistaken, or being taken by surprise by the class of events. Another manner of avoiding that is through our changeless hope of detecting new things. Harmonizing to James, by ground of these different sets of involvements, we are under no duty to suspend belief in God merely because to day of the month, God s being has non been proven by modern scientific discipline. It is a affair of which set of involvements we choose to take precedence of refering the hypothesis that God exists: ( a ) out of our fright of being mistaken or out of ( B ) our hope of being right. The individual who conforms to their hope of God s being is merely every bit sensible as the individual who gives in to their fright that there may non be a God at all. Some of James statement has been used late by Pope John Paul II. In his Contemplations on Fides et Ratio, the Pope claims that worlds are searchers of truth. And during that quest, ground can non prolong one entirely. Whether it is a inquiry of the truths of immediate experience or of scientific truth, of carefully developed philosophical idea or of an existentially lived thought, the hunt for truth is ever accompanied by an act of religion. In fact, as societal existences, worlds are incapable of verifying and determining everything entirely ; at every degree one must set enlightened trust in the testimony of others and in one s cultural tradition. As a searcher of truth, adult male is, by that really ground, the 1 who lives by belief. However, holding said that, knowledge through belief # 8211 ; without personal grounds of truth, seems to be imperfect cognition. But in other respects, what cognition is ascertained through self-sufficient agencies? Do we non put our trust in interpersonal relationships and believe, without much grounds, certa in things and take them to be the truth? Particularly when it is a inquiry of the indispensable truths of life which concern the person’s interior deepnesss. However, the trust one topographic point in the other individual must non be blind. If one has ground to believe that he might be lead oning himself or lead oning me, I must do the few limited confirmations accessible to me from the exterior, by cross-checking, for illustration, with other beginnings of information. To be worthy of our ground every bit good as of the other person’s freedom, â€Å"trust† must be enlightened, and, establishing itself on â€Å"reasons to believe† , it must besides be rational. Consequently, the human pursuit for truth non merely seeks the realisation of limited truths and instantly utile truths ; it besides strives for an absolute truth, which is accessible by idea. Since it is critical for human being, this ultimate truth will be reached, non merely by pure ground, but besides by enlightened trust in the testimony of others. Reason itself is non self-sufficing and needs certain trust, if it is to win in its hunt. ( Reflections on the Holy Father s Encyclical Fides et Ratio, Bishop Andre-Mutien Leornard ) Harmonizing to W.K. Clifford in The Ethical motives of Belief, we violate our moral responsibilities if we obtain beliefs where the grounds is deficient. ( Pojman, 91 ) This implies that it is non warranted to hold a full spiritual belief, unless there is persuasive grounds for it. The content of spiritual experience has been requisitioned non to number as grounds. Religious beliefs do non look to be axiomatic. So the lone available grounds would be a non-religious guess, from which the spiritual beliefs are implied. Therefore, the lone manner of make up ones minding whether the spiritual beliefs are warranted would be to analyze assorted statements with the non-religious beliefs as premises and the spiritual beliefs as decisions. ( J. Weseley Robbins, Indiana University ) Harmonizing to Clifford, if the known statements for God s being, including any statements from spiritual experience, are at best likely 1s, no 1 would be warranted in holding full belief that there is a God. And the same holds for other beliefs. Clifford claims that It is incorrect ever, everyplace, and for anyone, to believe anything upon deficient grounds. We are perpetrating a great wickedness. Every clip we let ourselves believe for unworthy grounds, we weaken our powers of self-denial, of doubting, of judicially and reasonably weighing grounds. ( Pojman, 95 ) I think this is true for certain things but it is to strict when applied to others. For illustration, we can non see what is traveling on at the underside of the ocean. Is it incorrect for us to believe that there is marine life down at that place? I have neer been to the Moon, does that intend that it is a wickedness for me to believe that it is non truly made of cheese. I would hold no manner of cognizing or wholly swearing the grounds before me unless I, myself, went to the Moon. Besides, another thing that I found a spot confounding about Clifford s statement is the usage of the apparently spiritual linguistic communication. For illustration, his usage of the words moral and wickedness. One would believe that, in order to believe in Clifford s statement one would hold to be an atheist so why usage such linguistic communication? On the other manus, in defence of Clifford, we implicitly rely upon evidentialist rules in many different countries of question. It is the footing of our justness system ( or we like to believe that it is that manner ) and it does do a batch of sense to merely believe in something when you are supplied with sufficient grounds. In decision, I d like to state that both of these choices were really convincing. I have ever used both religion and ground to get at certain personal truths and for that ground I was more positive by William James. I believe that religion and ground go manus in manus and one without the other is useless.